beta_testers__apps__remove

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=true. The description adds the HTTP method (DELETE) and the endpoint path, which slightly enhances transparency. No contradictions with annotations. However, no additional behavioral details (e.g., error states, side effects) are provided, making it acceptable but not exceptional.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence plus an endpoint reference. It is front-loaded with the core action and uses minimal, efficient wording. Every part contributes value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool is a simple relationship removal with no output schema, the description adequately conveys the operation. It lacks details on return values or error handling, but for a DELETE-like action this is often predictable. It is sufficiently complete for an agent to use correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema fully describes the two parameters (id and body with nested data array). The description adds no extra explanation beyond the schema, such as meaning of fields or constraints. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the action: 'Unlink apps from a beta tester.' The verb 'Unlink' and resource 'apps from a beta tester' are specific, and the accompanying HTTP DELETE path reinforces the purpose. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like beta_testers__apps__list (list) and beta_testers__beta_groups__add (add).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage by stating the action, but does not explicitly specify when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., when to unlink apps vs. remove from beta groups). No prerequisites or conditions are mentioned, leaving the agent to infer context from the name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.