app_store_version_phased_releases__update

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate idempotent and non-destructive. The description adds only the HTTP method and state values. No disclosure of side effects like what pausing affects or whether transitions are reversible. The 'PAUSE' vs 'PAUSED' discrepancy is a minor inaccuracy.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Very concise—one sentence plus endpoint. Every word is valuable. Front-loaded with the three actions. No waste.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, so the description should at least hint at the response (e.g., returns the updated resource). Lacks explanation of state transition validity or idempotency implications. Incomplete for a complete understanding.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the description adds little beyond the schema. It mentions the state field but does not explain the id requirement or the structure of the body in more detail. Meets baseline for high-coverage schemas.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb (Pause, resume, complete) and resource (phased release), with specific state values. It distinguishes from sibling tools like create/delete implicitly, but doesn't explicitly differentiate. The typo 'PAUSE' vs 'PAUSED' is minor but could cause confusion.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., create for new releases). No prerequisites or context for choosing among the three states. Usage is implied but not explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.