alternative_distribution_packages__versions__list

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already provide readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false, covering the safety profile. The description adds the endpoint but no further behavioral traits. With annotations present, a score of 3 is appropriate as the description does not add significant extra value beyond what is already structured.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single clear sentence plus the endpoint in brackets, providing the essential information without any wasted words. It is front-loaded with the action verb.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description together with the schema and annotations adequately covers a list operation. Pagination parameters (limit, next_url) are documented in schema. No output schema exists, but the return format is typically an array of version objects. Slight lack of explanation about the return structure, but overall complete for this context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

All 5 parameters are fully documented in the input schema (100% coverage). The description does not add any additional meaning or examples for parameters like filter_state or include. Baseline 3 is correct.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'List the versions belonging to an alternative distribution package', which specifies the action (list) and resource (versions). It distinguishes from sibling tools like get, deltas, and variants by focusing on listing all versions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. While the name implies listing all versions, the description does not mention context like filtering or pagination behavior that would help the agent decide between this and related tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.