alternative_distribution_packages__create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations are minimal (non-read-only, non-idempotent, non-destructive). The description adds only 'Create', which implies mutation, but nothing about side effects, permissions, or response behavior. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short (one sentence plus endpoint), which is concise but lacks structured information. It is not front-loaded with key details, making it minimally adequate.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of nested objects and required fields, the description is incomplete. It does not explain the purpose of an alternative distribution package, the required relationships, or any constraints. No output schema exists to compensate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, with the body parameter described in the schema as 'JSON:API request body'. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides, achieving the baseline of 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (Create) and resource (alternative distribution package) with the HTTP method and endpoint. It distinguishes the resource name from siblings, but does not explicitly differentiate it from other create tools like alternative_distribution_domains__create.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, prerequisites, or conditions. The description only states the basic operation without context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.