android_to_ios_app_mapping_details__create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations set readOnlyHint to false, idempotentHint to false, and destructiveHint to false, which the description does not contradict (it says 'Create', a non-idempotent write). The description adds no behavioral context beyond the annotations (e.g., no mention of side effects or authentication). With annotations present, the burden is lower, so a score of 3 is appropriate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with the HTTP method in brackets, which is concise and front-loaded with the verb. It could be slightly more structured by separating the endpoint note, but overall it is efficient and not verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of a nested input schema and no output schema, the description lacks important context such as prerequisites, the purpose of the mapping detail, and what the response contains. This is insufficient for an agent to fully understand the tool's use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema fully documents the required nested parameters. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema; it does not explain the purpose or usage of the 'body' parameter or its subfields. With high coverage, baseline is 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create an android to iOS app mapping detail', which is a specific verb and resource, distinguishing it from sibling tools like delete, get, update, and list. However, it does not explain what a mapping detail represents, missing context about its purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as when the mapping detail already exists or when to use the update or list operations. The name implies creation, but no explicit usage context is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.