beta_app_clip_invocation_localizations__delete

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description simply restates the delete action, adding no extra context beyond the annotations. It doesn't disclose irreversible effects, permissions, or side effects, relying entirely on the destructiveHint annotation without elaboration.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single focused sentence with the endpoint, no redundant text, and front-loads the action verb. It earns its place without waste.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple delete with one parameter and annotations indicating destructive/idempotent behavior, the description is adequate. It includes the endpoint for reference, though it could mention reversibility explicitly, but the annotations cover the core safety profile.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with the 'id' parameter described as 'ID from the matching list call.' The description adds no parameter-level detail, but the schema already fully documents the single parameter, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Delete a beta App Clip invocation localization') with a specific resource and includes the exact HTTP endpoint, distinguishing it from sibling create/update tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives or any prerequisites. The only usage hint (matching list call ID) appears in the schema, not in the description, and there's no mention of irreversibility or when deletion is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.