beta_app_localizations__get

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false. The description adds only the HTTP method and path, which is redundant. It does not disclose additional behavioral traits such as the return format or authentication requirements, providing minimal added value over annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences plus the HTTP path—extremely concise with no wasted words. Every element is relevant and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity of the tool (read by ID with an optional include parameter), the description is largely adequate. However, without an output schema, the agent might benefit from a brief note on what is returned (e.g., the beta app localization resource). This is a minor gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% (both parameters have descriptions in the schema). The description does not add any new information about parameters—it only reinforces the 'id' parameter by mentioning 'by ID'. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate as the description does not improve upon schema documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it reads one beta app localization by ID, with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like beta_app_localizations__list (which lists all) and beta_app_localizations__create (which creates).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when you have a specific ID, but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like beta_app_localizations__list or beta_app_localizations__app__get. No exclusions or context are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.