builds__beta_build_localizations__list

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false. The description confirms GET and no mutability, but adds no further behavioral context (e.g., pagination behavior, rate limits). With annotations present, the description does not enhance transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence plus endpoint, concise and front-loaded. Could be slightly improved by noting pagination, but currently no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a list operation with low complexity and no output schema, the description adequately communicates the purpose. It could mention that the response is an array of localization objects, but is otherwise complete given the simplicity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, with parameters `id`, `limit`, and `next_url` clearly described. The description mentions the URL pattern hinting at `id` as path parameter, but adds no substantive meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states 'List the beta build localizations belonging to a build' and includes the REST endpoint, clearly indicating the verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like create, get, delete, update, and other list tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context for listing localizations by build, but does not mention when not to use or suggest alternatives (e.g., the sibling `beta_build_localizations__list` which might list across builds). No explicit exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.