app_info_localizations__create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate this is a write (non-read-only, non-destructive) operation, but the description adds no further behavioral context such as idempotency, side effects, duplicate handling, or authentication requirements. It merely restates the action already implied by annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise, but it omits essential information. It is not verbose, but the under-specification reduces its value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of the nested input schema (required relationships, multiple optional fields) and the lack of an output schema, the description is severely incomplete. It does not explain the request body structure, response expectations, or specific constraints, making it insufficient for reliable invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage but only describes the 'body' parameter with a generic note. The tool description provides no explanation of the required fields ('name', 'locale', 'appInfo' relationship) or optional fields ('subtitle', privacy URLs, etc.), leaving the agent to infer semantics solely from the schema structure.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (create) and the resource (app info localization), which matches the tool name and endpoint. However, it does not distinguish from sibling tools like 'app_info_localizations__update' or 'app_info_localizations__delete', relying solely on the verb in the name.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., update, delete), no prerequisites, and no context on required relationships or conditions. The description is purely declarative.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.