vast42_delete_resource

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits, but it only says 'Delete a VAST 4.2 resource'. It does not mention whether deletion is permanent, irreversible, requires specific permissions, or affects related entities. The destructive nature is implied by 'Delete' but not elaborated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence that immediately conveys the action and target. It is well-structured and front-loaded, though very sparse; it earns its place but does not expand on important considerations.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is a simple delete operation with a single parameter, so the description is minimal but not fully complete. It lacks information about return values, error conditions, irreversibility, or any impact on associated resources, making it insufficient for an agent to anticipate the full effect of the call.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema covers 100% of the parameter documentation with 'VAST 4.2 resource ID', and the description does not add any additional parameter detail. With high schema coverage, the baseline of 3 is appropriate; the description offers no extra semantic contribution.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear action ('Delete') with a specific resource type ('VAST 4.2 resource'), which matches the tool name and distinguishes it from other VAST 4.2 delete tools via the 'resource' object. However, it does not elaborate on what exactly constitutes a 'resource' in this context, leaving some ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites, and no mention of related operations. The description simply states what it does without any contextual usage information.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.