delete_data_key

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden for behavioral disclosure. It simply says 'Delete a data key' without explaining that deletion is likely permanent, what cascading effects may occur, or any error conditions. This is a significant transparency gap for a destructive operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is exceptionally short and direct, containing no wasted text. However, it merely restates the tool name and does not provide any additional value. It is not overly verbose, but it also fails to earn its place by adding context.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a delete operation with one parameter, the description is too sparse. It does not disclose the permanent nature of deletion, potential impacts on related data (e.g., data key targets), or any special conditions. Given the absence of annotations, the description should provide more operational context to be complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema fully documents the single parameter 'id' with the description 'Data key ID', so schema description coverage is 100%. The description itself does not add any parameter semantics, but the baseline for high schema coverage is 3, and the tool name plus schema are sufficient for identifying the parameter's role.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Delete a data key' clearly states the action (delete) and the resource (data key), distinguishing it from sibling tools like create_data_key, get_data_key, and update_data_key. However, it lacks any additional details about scope or specific behavior, keeping it from a perfect score.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention any prerequisites, consequences, or exclusions, and the only implied usage is for deleting a data key. No explicit context is given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.