update_data_list

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description should disclose mutation behavior. It merely states 'update' without explaining partial update semantics, idempotency, permission requirements, or return values. The optional label parameter suggests partial update, but this is not stated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short sentence with no wasted words. However, the brevity sacrifices critical context, so it earns a 4 rather than 5.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple two-parameter CRUD tool, the description is minimally adequate, but it lacks information about return values and update behavior. Given no output schema or annotations, it should disclose more about the operation's outcome.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already describes both parameters (id and label) with 100% coverage. The description adds no parameter semantics, but the baseline of 3 is appropriate since the schema handles the definition.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool updates an existing data list, using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from create/delete/bulk operations by the verb 'update', though it does not elaborate on which attributes can be updated, relying on the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like create_data_list, delete_data_list, or bulk_upload_replace_data_list. The description does not specify prerequisites or whether this is for single-record updates only.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.