get_live_website_preview

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of disclosing behavioral traits. It only says 'Get live website preview URL' without mentioning side effects, return format, authentication requirements, or any limitations. This lack of detail leaves the agent without insight into what the tool actually does beyond the basic action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short, focused sentence with zero wasted words. All essential information is front-loaded and clearly stated, making it highly concise and properly structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has no output schema and no annotations, so the description needs to explain the return value and any constraints. It merely states 'Get live website preview URL' without clarifying the return format, any prerequisites, or how the parameters interact. This is under-specified for a tool that appears to return a URL, especially given the wide variety of sibling tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% for the two parameters ('Website URL to preview' and 'Zone ID to preview'), so the schema already documents the parameters. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, which is the baseline expected when coverage is high.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get live website preview URL' uses a specific verb ('Get') and resource ('live website preview URL'), making the tool's function clear. It does not explicitly distinguish from sibling tools, but no other sibling appears to offer preview functionality, so it is reasonably distinct.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no exclusions, and no context about typical use cases. It simply states the function without any usage direction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.