get_blendspace_info

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It states only 'Get core metadata' without disclosing what 'core metadata' includes, whether there are error conditions (e.g., invalid asset path), required permissions, or any return format nuances. The description adds little beyond the function's name.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise and well-structured: a one-sentence purpose followed by an Args section. Every word earns its place, and it is appropriately sized for a simple getter tool with one parameter.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple (one parameter) and has an output schema, so return values need not be explained in the description. However, the vague phrase 'core metadata' leaves ambiguity about what is retrieved, and the lack of usage guidelines is a clear gap. It is marginally adequate but not complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema only provides the parameter title 'Asset Path' with no description (0% coverage). The description's 'Args: asset_path: Unreal asset path' adds meaningful context by clarifying that the path is an Unreal asset path, which goes beyond the schema. For a single parameter, this is sufficient.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's action ('Get') and resource ('core metadata for a BlendSpace'), which is more specific than the tool name. However, it does not explicitly distinguish itself from sibling tools like get_blendspace_samples or audit_blendspace, so it lacks direct sibling differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as get_blendspace_samples, audit_blendspace, or other get_* sibling tools. There is no mention of conditions, exclusions, or preferred use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.