delete_blendspace_sample

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description only says 'Delete' without disclosing side effects, irreversibility, permissions, error behavior, or what happens if the sample index is invalid. The burden of behavioral disclosure is not met.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is succinct and front-loaded with the purpose, followed by a clear structured Args list. Every line is necessary and there is no redundancy or filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple two-parameter delete tool with an output schema, the description covers the operation and parameters adequately. However, it omits any mention of side effects, validation, or error conditions, though the output schema may provide return value details.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description includes an Args section that explains each parameter: asset_path is the BlendSpace asset path and sample_index is the index of the sample to delete. This fully compensates for the 0% schema description coverage and adds meaningful semantics beyond the raw schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Delete a sample from a BlendSpace' with a specific verb and resource, and lists the two parameters. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like add_blendspace_sample and edit_blendspace_sample.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Usage is implied by the tool name and the action, but there is no mention of prerequisites or exclusions, such as checking the index exists or using edit_blendspace_sample for modifications.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.