update_slack_settings

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description only states 'Update Slack integration settings' but does not disclose any behavioral traits such as whether it overrides or merges settings, required permissions (beyond Pro licensing), rate limits, or consequences. No annotations are provided to supplement.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise (one sentence + prerequisite). It is front-loaded with the prerequisite but lacks additional helpful context. It could be more informative without being verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, no annotations, and a complex required 'input' object, the description is inadequate. It does not explain return values, side effects, or how to use the parameters. A more complete description is needed for safe usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds no information about parameters. The input schema provides descriptions for each sub-field (e.g., 'Slack bot token for integration'), but the tool description itself is silent on how to structure the 'input' object. Schema description coverage for top-level param is 0%.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Update') and resource ('Slack integration settings in Metabase'). It distinguishes from generic sibling 'update_setting' by specifying Slack. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from potential other Slack-related tools like 'send_slack_bug_report'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The only hint is the prerequisite '[Requires Metabase Pro]', but no context on when not to use or what to use instead if Pro is not available.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.