delete_segment
Delete a segment from Metabase by specifying its ID and an optional reason for deletion.
Instructions
Delete a segment from Metabase
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| input | Yes |
Delete a segment from Metabase by specifying its ID and an optional reason for deletion.
Delete a segment from Metabase
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| input | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must disclose behaviors. It only states 'Delete' but does not mention if deletion is permanent, if there are cascading effects, or what the response indicates. Lacks essential safety context for a destructive operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single short sentence, which is concise. However, it sacrifices necessary detail for completeness, balancing poorly for a destructive tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Without annotations or output schema, the description should provide more context about the operation's effects (e.g., reversibility, dependencies). It is insufficient for an agent to safely invoke deletion.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema already provides descriptions for both parameters ('Segment ID to delete' and 'Message describing the reason for deletion'). The tool description adds no further semantic value beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Delete a segment from Metabase' clearly specifies the verb (delete), resource (segment), and system (Metabase). It differentiates from sibling tools like delete_card or delete_dashboard.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like delete_card or when not to use it. Prerequisites (e.g., user permissions) or conditions for safe deletion are not mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/takeokunn/metabase-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server