update_glossary_entry
Update a glossary entry by providing its ID and optionally modifying its name, definition, or synonyms.
Instructions
Update an existing glossary entry in Metabase
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| input | Yes |
Update a glossary entry by providing its ID and optionally modifying its name, definition, or synonyms.
Update an existing glossary entry in Metabase
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| input | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; the description only says 'update' without disclosing side effects, required permissions, or whether the entry must exist. Minimal transparency for a mutation tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single sentence with no unnecessary words or fluff, making it highly concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple update operation, the description is clear but lacks details on return values, error states, or additional context like non-modifiable fields. Adequate but not comprehensive.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The description adds no information about parameters; while the schema has descriptions for each field, the tool description itself covers 0% of parameters and fails to summarize what input is expected.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (update) and resource (glossary entry in Metabase), distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'create_glossary_entry' and 'delete_glossary_entry'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites (e.g., entry must exist), and no examples of when not to use it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/takeokunn/metabase-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server