notify_new_database_table
Notifies Metabase about a new table in a database using database ID and table ID.
Instructions
Notify Metabase of a new table in a database
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| input | Yes |
Notifies Metabase about a new table in a database using database ID and table ID.
Notify Metabase of a new table in a database
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| input | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It merely states a notification action without disclosing any behavioral traits like side effects, required permissions, idempotency, or error conditions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence with no superfluous words, making it easy to read. However, it may be too brief, sacrificing valuable context.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's complexity (nested parameters, no output schema, no annotations), the description is incomplete. It does not explain what the notification entails, return values, or handling of duplicate tables.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The description adds no meaning beyond the schema. Although the nested schema properties have brief descriptions, the top-level 'input' parameter lacks a description, and the schema coverage is 0%, so the description does not compensate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Notify' and resource 'Metabase of a new table', making the purpose understandable. However, it does not differentiate this tool from similar sibling tools like notify_database_sync or notify_database_sync_by_name.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no context about prerequisites, scenarios, or exclusions, leaving the agent uncertain about tool selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/takeokunn/metabase-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server