list_log_presets
Lists available log level presets in Metabase to help manage log configurations.
Instructions
List available log level presets in Metabase
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Lists available log level presets in Metabase to help manage log configurations.
List available log level presets in Metabase
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. The description does not disclose whether the operation is read-only, requires authentication, or any rate limits. It only states it lists presets.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single sentence that is front-loaded and concise. No wasted words, but could briefly add value without bloat.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and no annotations, the description lacks explanation of return format or what 'log level presets' are. It is minimally adequate for a simple list.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist; schema coverage is 100%. The description correctly implies no inputs are needed, meeting the baseline for zero-parameter tools.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb+resource combination ('List available log level presets') and distinguishes from siblings like list_cards or list_users.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs other list tools. Does not explain the purpose of log level presets or any prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/takeokunn/metabase-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server