execute_public_dashcard_action

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, and the description does not disclose side effects, permissions, or response behavior. It merely states 'execute' without indicating whether the action mutates state or requires authentication.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, but it is underspecified and fails to provide useful content. True conciseness would pack meaning into few words; here it is vague and uninformative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complex context (many sibling tools, no output schema, nested parameters), the description is grossly insufficient. It omits critical details like return values, error conditions, and usage context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 0% description coverage, and the description adds no explanation for parameters (uuid, dashcard_id, parameters). Without additional context, the agent cannot infer what values are expected.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states it executes an action on a public dashcard, providing a verb and resource. However, it does not distinguish among sibling tools like execute_dashcard_action or execute_public_action, leaving ambiguity about what 'action' means.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as execute_public_action or get_public_dashcard_execute. The description lacks context on prerequisites or intended scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.