delete_timeline_event

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states it deletes an event, but does not clarify whether it is a soft or hard delete, if it triggers side effects, requires authentication, or is irreversible beyond the implied destructiveness.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence of 8 words that is front-loaded with the verb and resource. No wasted words or superfluous information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and simple delete operation, the description is too minimal. It omits common details like expected response (e.g., 204 No Content), idempotency, error handling, or confirmation of successful deletion. Sibling tools may have richer descriptions.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage with a description for the 'id' parameter. The tool description adds only the generic phrase 'by ID', which is redundant. Baseline 3 is appropriate as the schema already provides parameter clarity.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'delete', the resource 'timeline event', the identifier method 'by ID', and the context 'in Metabase'. It distinguishes this tool from siblings like 'delete_timeline' (deletes a timeline) and 'create_timeline_event'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool, prerequisites, or alternatives. There is no mention of conditions under which deletion is allowed, or any warning about irreversible actions. The description is purely functional.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.