update_pulse
Modify a Metabase pulse's name, cards, channels, skip-if-empty setting, or archive status. Requires pulse ID.
Instructions
Update a pulse in Metabase
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| input | Yes |
Modify a Metabase pulse's name, cards, channels, skip-if-empty setting, or archive status. Requires pulse ID.
Update a pulse in Metabase
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| input | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist; description only says 'Update' implying mutation but omits any behavioral details like permissions, side effects, or return format.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise single sentence, no redundancy. However, it underspecifies, making it less helpful than it could be.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the complexity of the input schema (nested objects) and lack of output schema, the description is too minimal to fully inform agent behavior.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema's parameter descriptions are already detailed (e.g., 'The pulse ID'), so description adds no additional meaning. Baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states verb 'Update' and resource 'pulse' within 'Metabase', distinguishing it from sister tools like 'create_pulse' and 'get_pulse'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use vs alternatives, prerequisites, or scenarios to avoid. Single sentence lacks context for choosing this tool over related ones.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/takeokunn/metabase-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server