get_embed_dashboard_query

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It does not mention whether the operation has side effects, authentication requirements beyond the token parameter, rate limits, or error states. It only describes the basic action without safety context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, concise and front-loaded with the key action. However, it could be slightly more structured but remains effective with minimal waste.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of nested parameters and no annotations or output schema, the description is incomplete. It does not explain the return value format, potential errors, token usage details, or how the dashcard results are structured.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description does not add any additional meaning to the parameters beyond what is in the input schema. Although the schema has descriptions for 'token', 'dashcard_id', and 'card_id', the context signal indicates 0% schema description coverage, meaning the description should compensate but fails to do so.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Get card results for a dashcard in an embedded dashboard from Metabase', specifying the verb 'Get' and the resource 'card results for a dashcard', which distinguishes it from siblings like 'get_embed_card_query' or 'get_embed_dashboard_tile'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'get_embed_dashboard_tile' or 'get_embed_dashboard_params'. There are no exclusions or contexts mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.