get_collection

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only adds that 'root' is supported for the root collection, but omits any mention of permissions, authentication needs, rate limits, or what happens if the collection does not exist.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence of 14 words with no redundancy. Every word is necessary and provides clear, direct information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description explains the input (ID with 'root' support) but fails to describe the output (e.g., returns a collection object) or any other contextual details like whether nested items are included. It is minimally complete but could be improved.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema's parameter description already explains the 'id' parameter accepts integer or 'root'. The description reiterates the 'root' support without adding new meaning. With schema description coverage effectively present, the description offers no additional semantic value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves a single collection by ID from Metabase, using the verb 'Get' and specifying the resource. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like get_root_collection or get_collection_items by focusing on a single collection retrieval.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool over alternatives such as get_collection_items or get_collection_tree. The description lacks any context on prerequisites, limitations, or when this tool is the best choice.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.