dismiss_user_modal

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description implies a mutation (dismissing a modal) but does not disclose side effects, idempotency, permissions required, or any behavioral traits. With no annotations, the description carries the full burden and fails to provide adequate transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, very concise. However, it sacrifices completeness for brevity, which is acceptable but not ideal. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the absence of output schema and annotations, the description is incomplete. It does not explain what happens after dismissing, possible errors, or any return value. The nested object parameter further increases complexity, yet no details are provided.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds no meaning to the parameters. The schema has 0% description coverage and does not explain 'id' or 'modal' meaning. The tool description does not compensate, leaving the agent to guess parameter purposes.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'dismiss', the resource 'modal', and the context 'for a user in Metabase'. It is specific and likely distinguishes this tool from siblings, though it could specify which modals are affected.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not mention prerequisites, typical use cases, or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.