get_field_table_ids

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. The word 'Get' implies a read-only operation, but the description does not explicitly state non-destructiveness, required permissions, or any side effects. For a simple lookup, this is minimal but not fully transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that immediately communicates the tool's core function. It is front-loaded with no redundant information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, no output schema), the description covers the basic purpose. However, it lacks information about the return format (e.g., array of integers) and any constraints on input size, making it somewhat incomplete for agent reliance.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. The tool description ('Get unique Table IDs for a list of Field IDs') merely restates the schema's parameter description ('List of Field IDs to resolve Table IDs for') without adding new details like format, constraints, or examples. It does not effectively compensate for the missing schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Get') and the specific resource ('unique Table IDs for a list of Field IDs'). It is precise and distinguishes itself from sibling tools like get_field or get_table by specifying the mapping from field IDs to table IDs.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_field or get_table. The description does not mention prerequisites, limitations, or reasons to choose this tool over others (e.g., batching instead of individual lookups).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.