undo_pulse_unsubscribe
Re-subscribe an email to a Metabase pulse by providing the unsubscribe hash, email address, and pulse ID.
Instructions
Undo an email unsubscribe from a pulse in Metabase
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| input | Yes |
Re-subscribe an email to a Metabase pulse by providing the unsubscribe hash, email address, and pulse ID.
Undo an email unsubscribe from a pulse in Metabase
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| input | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. The description only states the action without disclosing behavioral traits like side effects, required permissions, or error states. Does not add value beyond stating the purpose.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, clear and front-loaded. However, it is too brief and could include more structured information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the existence of sibling tools and no output schema or annotations, the description is insufficient. It does not explain the expected outcome of the undo action or any constraints, leaving the agent underinformed.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%. The description does not explain the meaning or purpose of the parameters (hash, email, pulse_id). The input schema provides minimal descriptions, but the description adds nothing.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states it undoes an email unsubscribe from a pulse. It specifies the action (undo), resource (pulse unsubscribe), and context (email, Metabase). Differentiates from siblings like unsubscribe_pulse and undo_notification_unsubscribe by its specific action.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like undo_notification_unsubscribe or unsubscribe_pulse. No context on prerequisites or typical scenarios.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/takeokunn/metabase-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server