unsubscribe_notification_global

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full burden. It states a mutation (unsubscribe) but fails to disclose side effects, reversibility, or required permissions. The behavioral impact is unclear.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence that immediately communicates the verb and the scope ('globally'). Every word adds value, and there is no unnecessary text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and no annotations, the description is minimally complete for a simple unsubscribe action. However, it lacks details on the 'hash' parameter's origin, the expected result, or error conditions. For such a simple tool, it's adequate but could be more helpful.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema includes descriptions for both 'hash' and 'email' parameters, so the description adds no new semantic value. Schema coverage is effectively high, leaving the description with little to contribute on parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (unsubscribe) and resource (email from all Metabase notifications). The term 'globally' hints at scope, but it doesn't explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like 'unsubscribe_notification' which may be per-notification.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus other unsubscribe tools (e.g., unsubscribe_notification, unsubscribe_pulse). The description implies a global action but does not specify prerequisites or alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.