export_query

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It mentions exporting results but does not indicate whether it is read-only, if there are limitations (e.g., result size), or if it returns a file or creates a resource. The lack of such details is a gap for safe tool usage.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences long, front-loaded with the core purpose, and efficiently conveys the two usage modes. Every sentence adds value without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the absence of an output schema, the description lacks information about what the export returns (e.g., binary file, URL). It also does not cover prerequisites or potential errors. While the main functionality is clear, the description is incomplete for a fully autonomous agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema description coverage is 0% for the top-level 'input' parameter, but the tool description compensates by explaining the two query types and how to set the 'type' and related fields. However, it does not explain the 'database' or 'format' parameters, which still rely on the schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool exports query results in CSV, JSON, or XLSX format, distinguishing it from sibling tools that export saved cards or dashboards. The verb 'export' and resource 'query results' are specific.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit instructions for two query modes: MBQL and native SQL, including how to structure the input fields. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus the sibling export tools for cards or dashboards, though that is implied.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.