get_permission_group

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It states 'Get' implying a read-only, idempotent operation, but does not disclose authentication requirements, error behavior, or side effects. Basic transparency without rich detail.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence of 10 words with no redundant phrasing. Every word adds value, making it extremely concise and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter 'get by ID' tool without output schema or annotations, the description is functional but lacks details on output format, authorization, or edge cases. Adequate but not fully comprehensive.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

According to the context, schema description coverage is 0%. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema's parameter definition ('Permission group ID'). With low coverage, the description should elaborate, but it does not, leaving value unchanged.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get a single permission group by ID from Metabase' uses a clear verb 'Get', specifies the resource 'permission group', and scopes it uniquely by ID. It effectively distinguishes from siblings like 'list_permission_groups' (multiple) and mutations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use for retrieving a specific group by ID but does not explicitly state when to use this over alternatives, nor any prerequisites or context. Guidelines are implied but not explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.