get_workouts

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description indicates a read-only retrieval operation returning a summary list; no side effects are mentioned. While not explicitly stating it is non-destructive, the behavior is clear from the 'get' action and return description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, with two short sentences that convey purpose, return type, and the alternative for detailed data.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Description gives enough context for a summary list tool and points to the detailed variant. It does not enumerate the exact summary fields, but 'essential metadata only' is sufficient given the existence of a detailed counterpart.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so there is no parameter semantics to document. The description is complete in this regard.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool gets all workouts and returns a curated summary list with count and essential metadata. It distinguishes itself from get_workout_by_id, which provides detailed workout information.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly directs users to get_workout_by_id when detailed workout information including segments is needed, making the appropriate use case clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.