get_all_day_events

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

There are no annotations, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as read-only nature, data source, or potential side effects. Since nothing is disclosed beyond the basic action, the description fails to inform the agent about the tool's behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise and to the point, containing only the essential information about the parameter format. There is no redundancy or irrelevant detail, making it efficient for the agent to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description lacks essential context about what 'wellness events' actually represents, what the response structure will be, or how this data is used. Without output schema details or examples, the agent cannot fully anticipate the tool's behavior or results.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description provides the date format 'YYYY-MM-DD' in the Args section, which adds meaning beyond the schema's bare type 'string'. This helps the agent correctly format the parameter, but it is the only parameter and the description is otherwise minimal.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a verb 'Get' and a resource 'daily wellness events data', but the term 'wellness events' is ambiguous and could refer to various types of data (e.g., stress, body battery, all-day stress). It does not clearly differentiate from sibling tools like get_all_day_stress or get_body_battery_events.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool over alternatives. The description gives no conditions, examples, or hints about appropriate usage scenarios, leaving the agent to guess based on the name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.