get_body_composition

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description alone must convey behavior, but it only states that data is retrieved. It does not disclose read-only status, potential errors, or any side effects, leaving the agent without information about consequences of invoking the tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is brief and direct, leading with the purpose and followed by parameter details. It avoids redundant information and is easy to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the tool's function and all parameters, and since an output schema exists, it need not describe return values. However, it lacks any examples or edge-case notes, which could be useful but are not essential.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description fully explains both parameters: start_date is required and can be a single date or the start of a range, and end_date is optional and completes the range. It also specifies the YYYY-MM-DD format, which is not present in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Get') and resource ('body composition data') in the first sentence, making the tool's purpose unambiguous. It also specifies the date-based scope, which distinguishes it from other data retrieval tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use this tool (when body composition data is needed) but does not explicitly compare it to alternatives like get_weigh_ins or get_stats_and_body. No conditions or exclusions are provided, so guidance is minimal.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.