create_hdri_world

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose key behavioral aspects such as whether existing lighting is overwritten, required file formats, or side effects on the scene. The phrase 'Set up' suggests configuration but leaves the operational details vague.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, focused sentence with no unnecessary words. It is well-structured and front-loaded, immediately conveying the tool's purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with two parameters and no annotations, this description is too thin. It omits details about the strength parameter, return value, and potential side effects, making it insufficient for an agent to invoke the tool correctly without additional context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description hints at the 'filepath' parameter via 'image file' but provides no explanation for the 'strength' parameter. With 0% schema description coverage, the description adds minimal semantic value beyond the schema's type and default information.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Set up') with a clear resource ('HDRI environment lighting') and a source ('from an image file'). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like create_light and set_world_property, making the tool's purpose unmistakable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description clearly implies when to use this tool (when HDRI environment lighting is needed) and provides context about using an image file. However, it does not explicitly mention alternatives or when not to use it, stopping short of full explicit guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.