autotask_list_category_tools

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description bears full burden. It correctly indicates it lists tools with full schemas, implying a read-only operation. However, it does not disclose potential side effects or limitations (e.g., whether results are cached, performance impacts). With no annotations, this is adequate but not comprehensive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with action and result. Every sentence adds value: first states what it does, second provides usage context. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple single-parameter input schema and the meta-purpose of listing tools, the description is nearly complete. It clearly states the input source and output content (full schemas). Could be more explicit about output format but adequate for the context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents the category parameter. The description reiterates the parameter's purpose ('Category name from autotask_list_categories') without adding new meaning beyond the schema. Thus baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clear verb-object pair: 'List tools in a specific category with full schemas.' It specifies what it does (list tools) and the resource (category), and distinguishes itself from sibling tools like autotask_list_categories.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states 'Use after autotask_list_categories to see available tools and their parameters.' This guidance on when to use it is helpful, but does not mention when not to use it or alternative tools beyond dependencies.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.