undo
Revert the previous operation in Blender to restore an earlier state and fix mistakes.
Instructions
撤销上一步(Ctrl+Z)。
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Revert the previous operation in Blender to restore an earlier state and fix mistakes.
撤销上一步(Ctrl+Z)。
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v0.1.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It states that it undoes the last step but does not mention any limitations, side effects, or what types of actions are covered. This is acceptable for a basic undo but could be more explicit.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise, consisting of a single short sentence. No unnecessary words or redundancy.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with no parameters and no output schema, the description is self-contained and provides enough information for an agent to understand its purpose and use it correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, which matches the baseline of 4. The description correctly implies no input is needed.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action: '撤销上一步' (undo the last step). It is specific and distinguishes the tool from others like 'redo' and 'execute_code'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
It clearly indicates when to use the tool (to revert the last action) and provides a common shortcut (Ctrl+Z). It does not explicitly mention when not to use it, but the purpose is straightforward given the context of sibling tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.