save_image
Save Blender images to disk by setting the image, destination path, and optional format for export.
Instructions
把 Blender 内的图像保存到磁盘。
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | Yes | ||
| image | Yes | ||
| format | No |
Save Blender images to disk by setting the image, destination path, and optional format for export.
把 Blender 内的图像保存到磁盘。
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | Yes | ||
| image | Yes | ||
| format | No |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v0.1.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must convey side effects. It only says 'save' without mentioning potential overwrites, file format behavior, or impact on the Blender session. Minimal transparency is provided.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, concise sentence with the verb front-loaded. It is appropriately short, but the lack of additional structure (e.g., parameter hints, usage notes) reduces its effectiveness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the complexity of handling image saving (formats, paths, overwrites), the description is highly incomplete. It lacks any mention of error handling, supported formats, or interaction with the image data block, making it insufficient for an agent to use correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema has no descriptions for parameters, and the description does not explain what 'image' refers to (e.g., name vs. data block), what 'path' expects, or how 'format' affects output. All parameters are left undefined.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (save) and the resource (image in Blender) with a destination (disk). It is specific enough to distinguish from saving blend files or exporting, though it lacks explicit differentiation from similar tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like export_file or save_blend. The description gives no context for selecting this function over others.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.