set_cursor
Set the 3D cursor's position and rotation in Blender to precise coordinates, enabling accurate placement for modeling and editing tasks.
Instructions
设置 3D 游标位置/旋转。
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| location | No | ||
| rotation | No |
Set the 3D cursor's position and rotation in Blender to precise coordinates, enabling accurate placement for modeling and editing tasks.
设置 3D 游标位置/旋转。
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| location | No | ||
| rotation | No |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v0.1.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
There are no annotations and the description does not disclose behavioral details such as whether absent/null parameters leave the corresponding property unchanged, whether both properties are required, or any side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise and free of fluff; every word contributes to stating the tool's purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool this is near the minimum viable description, but it omits important calling context such as whether both location and rotation are needed, coordinate system, and how null values are handled.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema has no parameter descriptions, and the description only repeats the parameter names ('position/rotation') without adding units, coordinate space, expected array length, or optionality semantics.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('set') and the specific resource ('3D cursor'), and it distinguishes this tool from siblings by targeting the 3D cursor rather than objects, lights, or cameras.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any contextual conditions such as 'use this to place the cursor before adding objects'.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.