Skip to main content
Glama

store_rack_macro_variation

Plan or store a native variation of mapped rack macros in Ableton Live, binding exact rack and parameter state and reporting the observed count and stored index.

Instructions

Plan or store a new native variation of mapped rack macros. Binds exact rack and parameter state, reports the observed count and appended storedVariationIndex independently of selection; variation contents are not exposed by Live's API.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dryRunNoFalse executes with token and hash.
trackIdYestrack-N from list_tracks, return-N from get_set_mixer, or master.
deviceIdYesID from list_devices.
planHashNoPlan hash.
confirmationTokenNoSingle-use plan token.
expectedStateVersionYesObserved stateVersion.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changedv0.3.1
    • removedOutput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -true
    • addedOutput schema / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "oneOf": [
      +      {
      +        "properties": {
      +          "confirmation": {
      +            "properties": {
      +              "expiresAt": {
      +                "type": "number"
      +              },
      +              "planHash": {
      +                "pattern": "^[a-f0-9]{64}$",
      +                "type": "string"
      +              },
      +              "token": {
      +                "minLength": 1,
      +                "type": "string"
      +              }
      +            },
      +            "required": [
      +              "token",
      +              "planHash",
      +              "expiresAt"
      +            ],
      +            "type": "object"
      +          },
      +          "dryRun": {
      +            "const": true
      +          },
      +          "plan": {
      +            "type": "object"
      +          }
      +        },
      +        "required": [
      +          "dryRun",
      +          "plan",
      +          "confirmation"
      +        ],
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      {
      +        "properties": {
      +          "dryRun": {
      +            "const": false
      +          },
      +          "operationOutcome": {
      +            "properties": {
      +              "evidence": {
      +                "items": {
      +                  "type": "string"
      +                },
      +                "type": "array"
      +              },
      +              "reason": {
      +                "type": "string"
      +              },
      +              "schemaVersion": {
      +                "const": 1
      +              },
      +              "status": {
      +                "enum": [
      +                  "applied",
      +                  "outcome_unknown",
      +                  "postconditions_failed",
      +                  "pending_postconditions",
      +                  "pending_user_action"
      +                ]
      +              }
      +            },
      +            "required": [
      +              "schemaVersion",
      +              "status",
      +              "reason",
      +              "evidence"
      +            ],
      +            "type": "object"
      +          }
      +        },
      +        "required": [
      +          "dryRun",
      +          "operationOutcome"
      +        ],
      +        "type": "object"
      +      }
      +    ],
      +    "properties": {
      +      "dryRun": {
      +        "type": "boolean"
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "dryRun"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "properties": {
      +      "error": {
      +        "properties": {
      +          "message": {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "outcome": {
      +            "enum": [
      +              "unknown",
      +              "not_executed"
      +            ]
      +          }
      +        },
      +        "required": [
      +          "message",
      +          "outcome"
      +        ],
      +        "type": "object"
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "error"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "object"
      +  }
      +]
  2. Changed7 schema fields changedv0.3.0
    • changedInput schema / properties / confirmationToken / description
      Previous value: -"Short-lived, single-use token returned by the matching dry run."New value: +"Single-use plan token."
    • changedInput schema / properties / deviceId / description
      Previous value: -"Stable device ID returned by list_devices."New value: +"ID from list_devices."
    • changedInput schema / properties / dryRun / description
      Previous value: -"Omit or true to return a plan; false requires a valid confirmationToken."New value: +"False executes with token and hash."
    • changedInput schema / properties / expectedStateVersion / description
      Previous value: -"Exact stateVersion observed immediately before planning."New value: +"Observed stateVersion."
    • changedInput schema / properties / planHash / description
      Previous value: -"Hash returned by the matching dry run."New value: +"Plan hash."
    • changedInput schema / properties / trackId / description
      Previous value: -"Stable device-owner ID: track-N from list_tracks, return-N from get_set_mixer, or master."New value: +"track-N from list_tracks, return-N from get_set_mixer, or master."
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. Addedv0.2.0

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false. The description adds meaningful behavioral detail: it binds exact rack and parameter state, reports the observed count and appended storedVariationIndex independently of selection, and notes that Live's API does not expose variation contents.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tightly packed sentences: the first states purpose, the second covers behavioral behavior and a key API limitation. The description is front-loaded and every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists and the input schema is fully documented, so return values and parameter details need not be repeated. The description covers purpose, binding behavior, and the API limitation, though it could have briefly explained the plan/confirm token workflow that is only present in schema descriptions.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all six parameters are documented in the schema itself. The description does not add syntax, format, or constraint details beyond what the schema provides, making the baseline 3 appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: 'Plan or store a new native variation of mapped rack macros.' The word 'new' implicitly distinguishes it from recall/delete variations, but no sibling tool is named explicitly, so it falls short of the top score.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description says what the tool does but gives no explicit guidance on when to use it versus recall_rack_macro_variation, delete_rack_macro_variation, or randomize_rack_macros. The plan-or-store distinction is implied, but there are no exclusions or alternative routing statements.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools