Skip to main content
Glama

jump_to_arrangement_cue_point

Destructive

Move Ableton Live's Arrangement playhead to a cue point with state and recording safeguards. Dry run first, then execute with a single-use token and expected state version.

Instructions

Plan or request one native locator jump with identity and recording guards. Stopped receipts verify position; playing jumps can be quantized and do not establish arrival or audible Arrangement playback.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dryRunNoFalse executes with token and hash.
planHashNoPlan hash.
cuePointIdYesCurrent cue-point ID from list_arrangement_cue_points.
confirmationTokenNoSingle-use plan token.
expectedStateVersionYesObserved stateVersion.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changedv0.3.1
    • removedOutput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -true
    • addedOutput schema / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "oneOf": [
      +      {
      +        "properties": {
      +          "confirmation": {
      +            "properties": {
      +              "expiresAt": {
      +                "type": "number"
      +              },
      +              "planHash": {
      +                "pattern": "^[a-f0-9]{64}$",
      +                "type": "string"
      +              },
      +              "token": {
      +                "minLength": 1,
      +                "type": "string"
      +              }
      +            },
      +            "required": [
      +              "token",
      +              "planHash",
      +              "expiresAt"
      +            ],
      +            "type": "object"
      +          },
      +          "dryRun": {
      +            "const": true
      +          },
      +          "plan": {
      +            "type": "object"
      +          }
      +        },
      +        "required": [
      +          "dryRun",
      +          "plan",
      +          "confirmation"
      +        ],
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      {
      +        "properties": {
      +          "dryRun": {
      +            "const": false
      +          },
      +          "operationOutcome": {
      +            "properties": {
      +              "evidence": {
      +                "items": {
      +                  "type": "string"
      +                },
      +                "type": "array"
      +              },
      +              "reason": {
      +                "type": "string"
      +              },
      +              "schemaVersion": {
      +                "const": 1
      +              },
      +              "status": {
      +                "enum": [
      +                  "applied",
      +                  "outcome_unknown",
      +                  "postconditions_failed",
      +                  "pending_postconditions",
      +                  "pending_user_action"
      +                ]
      +              }
      +            },
      +            "required": [
      +              "schemaVersion",
      +              "status",
      +              "reason",
      +              "evidence"
      +            ],
      +            "type": "object"
      +          }
      +        },
      +        "required": [
      +          "dryRun",
      +          "operationOutcome"
      +        ],
      +        "type": "object"
      +      }
      +    ],
      +    "properties": {
      +      "dryRun": {
      +        "type": "boolean"
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "dryRun"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "properties": {
      +      "error": {
      +        "properties": {
      +          "message": {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "outcome": {
      +            "enum": [
      +              "unknown",
      +              "not_executed"
      +            ]
      +          }
      +        },
      +        "required": [
      +          "message",
      +          "outcome"
      +        ],
      +        "type": "object"
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "error"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "object"
      +  }
      +]
  2. Changed6 schema fields changedv0.3.0
    • changedInput schema / properties / confirmationToken / description
      Previous value: -"Short-lived, single-use token returned by the matching dry run."New value: +"Single-use plan token."
    • changedInput schema / properties / cuePointId / description
      Previous value: -"Stable cue-point ID."New value: +"Current cue-point ID from list_arrangement_cue_points."
    • changedInput schema / properties / dryRun / description
      Previous value: -"Omit or true to return a plan; false requires a valid confirmationToken."New value: +"False executes with token and hash."
    • changedInput schema / properties / expectedStateVersion / description
      Previous value: -"Exact stateVersion observed immediately before planning."New value: +"Observed stateVersion."
    • changedInput schema / properties / planHash / description
      Previous value: -"Hash returned by the matching dry run."New value: +"Plan hash."
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Adds real behavior beyond the annotations: identity and recording guards, that stopped jumps produce receipts that verify position, and that playing jumps may be quantized without confirming arrival or audible playback. This is meaningful disclosure for a destructive-flagged, non-idempotent tool, though it never explains why the operation is marked destructive or what exactly is at risk.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tightly packed sentences with the core action front-loaded and caveats trailing. Every clause carries information, though the telegraphic style ('Stopped receipts verify position') costs some immediate readability.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists and the schema is fully documented, so the description only needs to carry behavioral nuance, which it largely does via the guards and quantized-jump caveats. The main gap is the unexplained destructive flag and the missing linkage to list_arrangement_cue_points as the source of valid IDs.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with per-parameter descriptions (dryRun, planHash, confirmationToken, cuePointId, expectedStateVersion), so the baseline is 3. The description reinforces the plan/execute pattern but adds no syntax, format, or constraint detail beyond what the schema already documents.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource ('native locator jump') and implies a plan/execute duality, which distinguishes it from the sibling cue-point tools that list/create/rename/delete points. The jargon 'native locator jump' is less accessible than 'jump the playhead to an arrangement cue point', but the operation is still identifiable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

'Plan or request' implies a dry-run-then-execute flow without stating it explicitly, and nothing says when to use this versus other navigation tools or that a cue point must first be obtained. Usage is inferable but not spelled out; the schema's 'from list_arrangement_cue_points' hint does some of this work but the description does not.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools