Skip to main content
Glama

get_device_sidechain_routing

Read-onlyIdempotent

Reads the exact native external-sidechain source type and channel for a loaded device, reports unsupported cases, and distinguishes this routing from track input routing.

Instructions

Read exact native external-sidechain source type and channel choices for one loaded device. Reports unsupported explicitly; does not confuse device-sidechain routing with track input routing.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
trackIdYestrack-N from list_tracks, return-N from get_set_mixer, or master.
deviceIdYesID from list_devices.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changedv0.3.1
    • removedOutput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -true
    • addedOutput schema / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "properties": {
      +      "device": {
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "deviceId": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "sidechain": {
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "stateVersion": {
      +        "minimum": 1,
      +        "type": "integer"
      +      },
      +      "trackId": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "stateVersion",
      +      "trackId",
      +      "deviceId",
      +      "device",
      +      "sidechain"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "properties": {
      +      "error": {
      +        "properties": {
      +          "message": {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "outcome": {
      +            "enum": [
      +              "unknown",
      +              "not_executed"
      +            ]
      +          }
      +        },
      +        "required": [
      +          "message",
      +          "outcome"
      +        ],
      +        "type": "object"
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "error"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "object"
      +  }
      +]
  2. Changed3 schema fields changedv0.3.0
    • changedInput schema / properties / deviceId / description
      Previous value: -"Stable device ID returned by list_devices."New value: +"ID from list_devices."
    • changedInput schema / properties / trackId / description
      Previous value: -"Stable device-owner ID: track-N from list_tracks, return-N from get_set_mixer, or master."New value: +"track-N from list_tracks, return-N from get_set_mixer, or master."
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive and closed-world semantics, so the bar is lower. The description still adds real behavioral value: it notes that unsupported cases are reported explicitly rather than erroring, and it clarifies the semantic boundary against track input routing.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tightly written sentences with zero filler; the core purpose is front-loaded and the disambiguation constraint follows immediately. Every clause earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present and annotations covering the safety profile, the description needs only to establish purpose, scope and edge-case behavior, which it does. A single mention of the write-side sibling would make it fully complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and both parameters (trackId, deviceId) are fully documented in the schema, so the baseline is 3. The description's 'one loaded device' only loosely echoes the deviceId requirement and adds no format or sourcing detail beyond what the schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (Read) and a precise resource (native external-sidechain source type and channel choices) scoped to one loaded device. An agent can distinguish it from its write counterpart set_device_sidechain_routing by the 'Read' framing, though that sibling is never named explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'for one loaded device' implies the required state, and the closing clause steers the agent away from confusing this with track input routing (get_track_routing/get_track_midi_routing). However, it never states when to prefer this tool over its sibling set_device_sidechain_routing or any prerequisite conditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools