Skip to main content
Glama

analyze_midi_clip_chords

Read-onlyIdempotent

Analyze sustained-note-aware chord events in a MIDI clip against Live's key and scale to identify candidates, inversions, Roman-numeral function, ambiguity, and pitch classes. Read-only.

Instructions

Analyze sustained-note-aware chord events in one exact MIDI clip against the current Live key and scale. Returns deterministic chord candidates, inversions, Roman-numeral function, ambiguity, and chromatic pitch classes without editing notes. Read-only.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
clipIdYeslist_clips Session ID or supported list_arrangement_clips ID.
trackIdYesID from list_tracks.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changedv0.3.1
    • changedInput schema / properties / clipId / description
      Previous value: -"Session ID from list_clips; Arrangement ID from list_arrangement_clips where supported."New value: +"list_clips Session ID or supported list_arrangement_clips ID."
    • removedOutput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -true
    • addedOutput schema / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "properties": {
      +      "analysis": {
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "clipId": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "lengthBeats": {
      +        "type": "number"
      +      },
      +      "stateVersion": {
      +        "minimum": 1,
      +        "type": "integer"
      +      },
      +      "trackId": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "stateVersion",
      +      "trackId",
      +      "clipId",
      +      "lengthBeats",
      +      "analysis"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "properties": {
      +      "error": {
      +        "properties": {
      +          "message": {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "outcome": {
      +            "enum": [
      +              "unknown",
      +              "not_executed"
      +            ]
      +          }
      +        },
      +        "required": [
      +          "message",
      +          "outcome"
      +        ],
      +        "type": "object"
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "error"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "object"
      +  }
      +]
  2. Changed3 schema fields changedv0.3.0
    • changedInput schema / properties / clipId / description
      Previous value: -"Stable clip ID: track-N:clip-M from list_clips, or track-N:arrangement-clip-M from list_arrangement_clips for tools that support Arrangement clips."New value: +"Session ID from list_clips; Arrangement ID from list_arrangement_clips where supported."
    • changedInput schema / properties / trackId / description
      Previous value: -"Stable track ID returned by list_tracks."New value: +"ID from list_tracks."
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint/idempotentHint/destructiveHint=false, and the description reinforces this with 'without editing notes. Read-only.' Beyond that it adds genuinely useful behavior: 'sustained-note-aware' handling, 'deterministic' output, and dependence on the current Live key/scale context. It stops short of disclosing edge cases (empty clips, non-chordal material).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tightly packed sentences with zero filler; the core purpose leads and the return contents plus read-only guarantee follow. No wasted clauses.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be spelled out, yet the description helpfully previews the result shape (candidates, inversions, Roman-numeral function, ambiguity, pitch classes). Combined with 100% schema coverage and full annotation set, nothing an agent needs to call it correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so both trackId and clipId (including the list_clips/list_arrangement_clips ID provenance) are already documented in the schema. The description adds no further meaning about the parameters, so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (analyze) and resource (chord events in one exact MIDI clip) and clarifies it runs against the current Live key and scale. The chord-focused framing clearly separates it from sibling analyzers like analyze_midi_clip_scale and analyze_midi_parts without needing the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied: it is a read-only analysis tool that does not edit notes. However, it never states when to choose this over closely related siblings such as analyze_midi_clip_scale or analyze_midi_feel, nor any prerequisites, so the agent must infer the situation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools