Skip to main content
Glama

get_track_freeze_state

Read-onlyIdempotent

Read a track's native freeze state by ID to check Ableton's frozen flag; this does not confirm saved state or audio equivalence.

Instructions

Read one track native freeze state. A frozen flag does not prove saved state or audio equivalence.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
trackIdYesID from list_tracks.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changedv0.3.1
    • removedOutput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -true
    • addedOutput schema / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "properties": {
      +      "freeze": {
      +        "properties": {
      +          "frozen": {
      +            "anyOf": [
      +              {
      +                "type": "boolean"
      +              },
      +              {
      +                "type": "null"
      +              }
      +            ]
      +          },
      +          "supported": {
      +            "type": "boolean"
      +          }
      +        },
      +        "required": [
      +          "supported"
      +        ],
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "stateVersion": {
      +        "minimum": 1,
      +        "type": "integer"
      +      },
      +      "trackId": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "stateVersion",
      +      "trackId",
      +      "freeze"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "properties": {
      +      "error": {
      +        "properties": {
      +          "message": {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "outcome": {
      +            "enum": [
      +              "unknown",
      +              "not_executed"
      +            ]
      +          }
      +        },
      +        "required": [
      +          "message",
      +          "outcome"
      +        ],
      +        "type": "object"
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "error"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "object"
      +  }
      +]
  2. Changed2 schema fields changedv0.3.0
    • changedInput schema / properties / trackId / description
      Previous value: -"Stable track ID returned by list_tracks."New value: +"ID from list_tracks."
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint/idempotentHint/destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds real value beyond those flags with the caveat that a frozen flag does not prove saved state or audio equivalence — a substantive warning about how to interpret the returned value.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences: purpose first, interpretive caveat second. Nothing is redundant and nothing needs to be read twice.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return-value shape need not be described, and annotations carry the safety profile. For a single-parameter read tool the description is nearly sufficient, with the only real gap being the lack of explicit contrast with set_track_freeze_state.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and there is a single required trackId documented as 'ID from list_tracks.' The description adds no syntax, format, or sourcing detail beyond the schema, so the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Names a specific verb ('Read') and resource ('one track native freeze state'), so the agent knows exactly what it retrieves. It does not, however, name or distinguish itself from the sibling set_track_freeze_state, which is the natural confuse-pair for a freeze-state tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by 'Read one track native freeze state' — query the current freeze status for a track. There is no explicit when-to-use, when-not-to-use, or pointer to alternatives such as set_track_freeze_state to change the state; the second sentence is an interpretation caveat rather than routing guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools