Skip to main content
Glama

get_audio_clip_state

Read-onlyIdempotent

Read audio clip settings, markers, and timeline identity for a track and clip in Ableton Live. Reports if fades are supported.

Instructions

Read Session/Arrangement audio settings, markers and timeline identity. Unavailable fades report supported=false.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
clipIdYeslist_clips Session ID or supported list_arrangement_clips ID.
trackIdYesID from list_tracks.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changedv0.3.1
    • changedInput schema / properties / clipId / description
      Previous value: -"Session ID from list_clips; Arrangement ID from list_arrangement_clips where supported."New value: +"list_clips Session ID or supported list_arrangement_clips ID."
    • removedOutput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -true
    • addedOutput schema / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "properties": {
      +      "clipId": {
      +        "anyOf": [
      +          {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          {
      +            "type": "null"
      +          }
      +        ]
      +      },
      +      "deviceId": {
      +        "anyOf": [
      +          {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          {
      +            "type": "null"
      +          }
      +        ]
      +      },
      +      "gain": {
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "loop": {
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "markers": {
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "pitch": {
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "setFingerprint": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "source": {
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "stateVersion": {
      +        "minimum": 1,
      +        "type": "integer"
      +      },
      +      "trackId": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "warpMarkers": {
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "warping": {
      +        "type": "boolean"
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "stateVersion",
      +      "trackId",
      +      "clipId"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "properties": {
      +      "error": {
      +        "properties": {
      +          "message": {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "outcome": {
      +            "enum": [
      +              "unknown",
      +              "not_executed"
      +            ]
      +          }
      +        },
      +        "required": [
      +          "message",
      +          "outcome"
      +        ],
      +        "type": "object"
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "error"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "object"
      +  }
      +]
  2. Changed3 schema fields changedv0.3.0
    • changedInput schema / properties / clipId / description
      Previous value: -"Stable clip ID: track-N:clip-M from list_clips, or track-N:arrangement-clip-M from list_arrangement_clips for tools that support Arrangement clips."New value: +"Session ID from list_clips; Arrangement ID from list_arrangement_clips where supported."
    • changedInput schema / properties / trackId / description
      Previous value: -"Stable track ID returned by list_tracks."New value: +"ID from list_tracks."
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false, and openWorldHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds useful behavioral detail with "Unavailable fades report supported=false," but it does not go further into failure modes, permissions, or output shape.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two short sentences and front-loads the core read scope. The second sentence about unavailable fades is a useful caveat, though slightly cryptic without more context.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With rich annotations, 100% schema coverage, and an output schema, the description only needs to state scope and notable caveats. It does that, though it could be more complete by clarifying the distinction from adjacent clip-inspection and timing tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with both clipId and trackId documented directly in the input schema. The description adds no additional parameter semantics beyond what the schema already provides, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ("Read") and names the resource areas: "Session/Arrangement audio settings, markers and timeline identity." This distinguishes it from the mutating sibling set_audio_clip_state, but it does not explicitly name or differentiate itself from related read tools such as analyze_audio_clip or get_clip_timing.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It states what is read but gives no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus set_audio_clip_state, analyze_audio_clip, get_clip_timing, or other clip-inspection siblings. There are no prerequisites, exclusions, or alternative-selection conditions in the description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools