ableton-mcp

Overview Schema Source Related Servers Discussions Admin

group_tracks

Destructive

Create a native Group from two to 64 consecutive ungrouped audio tracks in Ableton Live via macOS UI, with dry-run and verification for safe Set changes.

Instructions

Create a native Group through macOS English Live UI from two to 64 consecutive ungrouped ordinary audio-producing tracks feeding Main. Saved Set, stopped playback/recording, unarmed/unfrozen sources and no pending launches required. Changes focus, hierarchy, routing and track IDs. Verifies retained objects and exposed material/controls. Partial results remain; no automatic undo. Retain groupingId for lost-response inspection. All profile.

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description
`dryRun`	No	False executes with token and hash.
`planHash`	No	Plan hash.
`trackIds`	Yes	Consecutive exact track IDs in Live order.
`confirmationToken`	No	Single-use plan token.
`expectedStateVersion`	Yes	Observed stateVersion.
`expectedSetFingerprint`	Yes	Current Set fingerprint from get_live_state.

Output Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed2 schema fields changedv0.3.1Oct 23, 2026

removedOutput schema / additionalProperties
```
Removed value: -true
```

addedOutput schema / anyOf

Added value: +[
+  {
+    "oneOf": [
+      {
+        "properties": {
+          "confirmation": {
+            "properties": {
+              "expiresAt": {
+                "type": "number"
+              },
+              "planHash": {
+                "pattern": "^[a-f0-9]{64}$",
+                "type": "string"
+              },
+              "token": {
+                "minLength": 1,
+                "type": "string"
+              }
+            },
+            "required": [
+              "token",
+              "planHash",
+              "expiresAt"
+            ],
+            "type": "object"
+          },
+          "dryRun": {
+            "const": true
+          },
+          "plan": {
+            "type": "object"
+          }
+        },
+        "required": [
+          "dryRun",
+          "plan",
+          "confirmation"
+        ],
+        "type": "object"
+      },
+      {
+        "properties": {
+          "dryRun": {
+            "const": false
+          },
+          "operationOutcome": {
+            "properties": {
+              "evidence": {
+                "items": {
+                  "type": "string"
+                },
+                "type": "array"
+              },
+              "reason": {
+                "type": "string"
+              },
+              "schemaVersion": {
+                "const": 1
+              },
+              "status": {
+                "enum": [
+                  "applied",
+                  "outcome_unknown",
+                  "postconditions_failed",
+                  "pending_postconditions",
+                  "pending_user_action"
+                ]
+              }
+            },
+            "required": [
+              "schemaVersion",
+              "status",
+              "reason",
+              "evidence"
+            ],
+            "type": "object"
+          }
+        },
+        "required": [
+          "dryRun",
+          "operationOutcome"
+        ],
+        "type": "object"
+      }
+    ],
+    "properties": {
+      "dryRun": {
+        "type": "boolean"
+      }
+    },
+    "required": [
+      "dryRun"
+    ],
+    "type": "object"
+  },
+  {
+    "properties": {
+      "error": {
+        "properties": {
+          "message": {
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "outcome": {
+            "enum": [
+              "unknown",
+              "not_executed"
+            ]
+          }
+        },
+        "required": [
+          "message",
+          "outcome"
+        ],
+        "type": "object"
+      }
+    },
+    "required": [
+      "error"
+    ],
+    "type": "object"
+  }
+]

Addedv0.3.0Oct 19, 2026

TDQS

A4.1/5.0

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=false; the description adds substantial context beyond them, disclosing that focus, hierarchy, routing and track IDs change, that partial results remain, and that there is no automatic undo. Retaining groupingId for lost-response inspection is a genuinely useful operational detail.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The most decision-relevant facts (what it creates and the consecutive-track scope) are front-loaded, and almost every sentence carries distinct information. It is dense and jargon-heavy, with a few shorthand clauses that border on cryptic, but nothing is plainly wasteful.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive UI-driven mutation with 6 params and an output schema, the description covers preconditions, mutation effects, partial-failure behavior, undo absence, and the lost-response recovery hint. Return values are already covered by the output schema, so nothing material is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3; the schema already documents trackIds range and the token/hash/fingerprint guards. The description reinforces the 2-64 consecutive constraint but adds no syntax or format detail beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Create a native Group') plus a precise scope ('two to 64 consecutive ungrouped ordinary audio-producing tracks feeding Main'). This is far more specific than the sibling get_track_grouping_status or ungroup_tracks, though it never explicitly names those siblings to route the agent.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives clear preconditions for use: a saved Set, stopped playback/recording, unarmed/unfrozen sources and no pending launches. That is strong when-to-use context, but it never names the alternative (ungroup_tracks) or states when NOT to group.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server