Skip to main content
Glama

save_track_state_snapshot

Capture a track's exact state as a named local JSON snapshot without overwriting. Excludes clips, hidden plugin state, samples, automation, and mappings.

Instructions

Capture one exact track state and save its JSON to the private named local snapshot library. Never overwrites; excludes clips, hidden plugin state, samples, automation and mappings.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYesNew local snapshot name; letters, numbers, dot, underscore and hyphen only.
trackIdYesID from list_tracks.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changedv0.3.1
    • removedOutput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -true
    • addedOutput schema / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "properties": {
      +      "limitation": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "name": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "path": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "stateVersion": {
      +        "minimum": 1,
      +        "type": "integer"
      +      },
      +      "trackId": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "stateVersion",
      +      "name",
      +      "path",
      +      "trackId",
      +      "limitation"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "properties": {
      +      "error": {
      +        "properties": {
      +          "message": {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "outcome": {
      +            "enum": [
      +              "unknown",
      +              "not_executed"
      +            ]
      +          }
      +        },
      +        "required": [
      +          "message",
      +          "outcome"
      +        ],
      +        "type": "object"
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "error"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "object"
      +  }
      +]
  2. Changed2 schema fields changedv0.3.0
    • changedInput schema / properties / trackId / description
      Previous value: -"Stable track ID returned by list_tracks."New value: +"ID from list_tracks."
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Goes well beyond the annotations: 'Never overwrites' is useful and consistent with destructiveHint=false and idempotentHint=false, and the explicit exclusion list (clips, hidden plugin state, samples, automation, mappings) tells the agent exactly what will NOT be in the snapshot. It stops short of saying what happens on a name collision (error vs. suffix) or whether the snapshot is readable by other sessions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tight sentences, front-loaded with the action and scope, followed by the safety/exclusion caveats. No filler and nothing repeated from the schema.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists so return values need no explanation, and the annotations cover the safety profile. The exclusion list closes the biggest ambiguity for a snapshot tool; the only remaining gap is collision/error behavior when the name already exists.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so both parameters are already documented, including the name character set and that trackId comes from list_tracks. The description adds only the framing that the library is 'private' and 'named local', which slightly enriches the meaning of name but does not add new constraints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource: capture a track state and save its JSON to a named local snapshot library. However, siblings include capture_track_state_snapshot, load_track_state_snapshot and recall_track_state_snapshot, and the description never names them or explains how this differs from a plain capture, so the agent must infer the capture-vs-save split.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by 'save its JSON to the private named local snapshot library' and the fact it never overwrites, but there is no explicit when-to-use, no when-not, and no routing to the sibling capture/load/recall tools that an agent would otherwise have to disambiguate itself.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools