Skip to main content
Glama

get_midi_clip_notes

Read-onlyIdempotent

Read MIDI notes from a specific Session or Arrangement clip using track and clip IDs to inspect note data; Arrangement responses include timeline identity.

Instructions

Read standard MIDI notes from one exact Session or Arrangement MIDI clip; Arrangement responses include timeline identity.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
clipIdYeslist_clips Session ID or supported list_arrangement_clips ID.
trackIdYesID from list_tracks.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changedv0.3.1
    • changedInput schema / properties / clipId / description
      Previous value: -"Session ID from list_clips; Arrangement ID from list_arrangement_clips where supported."New value: +"list_clips Session ID or supported list_arrangement_clips ID."
    • removedOutput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -true
    • addedOutput schema / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "properties": {
      +      "clipId": {
      +        "anyOf": [
      +          {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          {
      +            "type": "null"
      +          }
      +        ]
      +      },
      +      "deviceId": {
      +        "anyOf": [
      +          {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          {
      +            "type": "null"
      +          }
      +        ]
      +      },
      +      "lengthBeats": {
      +        "type": "number"
      +      },
      +      "notes": {
      +        "type": "array"
      +      },
      +      "setFingerprint": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "stateVersion": {
      +        "minimum": 1,
      +        "type": "integer"
      +      },
      +      "trackId": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "stateVersion",
      +      "notes"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "properties": {
      +      "error": {
      +        "properties": {
      +          "message": {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "outcome": {
      +            "enum": [
      +              "unknown",
      +              "not_executed"
      +            ]
      +          }
      +        },
      +        "required": [
      +          "message",
      +          "outcome"
      +        ],
      +        "type": "object"
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "error"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "object"
      +  }
      +]
  2. Changed3 schema fields changedv0.3.0
    • changedInput schema / properties / clipId / description
      Previous value: -"Stable clip ID: track-N:clip-M from list_clips, or track-N:arrangement-clip-M from list_arrangement_clips for tools that support Arrangement clips."New value: +"Session ID from list_clips; Arrangement ID from list_arrangement_clips where supported."
    • changedInput schema / properties / trackId / description
      Previous value: -"Stable track ID returned by list_tracks."New value: +"ID from list_tracks."
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A3.5/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive and closed-world, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds one useful behavioral note — Arrangement responses carry timeline identity — but says nothing about whether notes are returned raw vs. transformed, ordering, or limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with no filler; the read operation and clip-scope constraint come first. It is efficient, though the term 'standard' is left undefined and slightly weakens precision.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present and rich annotations, the description needn't explain return values, and both parameters are documented. It is largely complete for a narrow read tool, with the only omission being how it relates to the extended sibling.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with clipId explaining it comes from list_clips or list_arrangement_clips and trackId from list_tracks. The description's 'Session or Arrangement' phrasing echoes rather than extends that, and it adds no new semantics for the two required IDs.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Read standard MIDI notes') and scopes it to 'one exact Session or Arrangement MIDI clip,' which is clear. However, it never names or distinguishes itself from the obvious sibling get_midi_clip_notes_extended, so the agent must infer what 'standard' means.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Use is implied by the phrase 'one exact ... clip' and the schema's pointer to list_clips / list_arrangement_clips IDs, but there is no explicit when-to-use, when-not, or routing to the extended variant or the note-analysis siblings. Adequate but with clear gaps.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools