deactivate-account
Deactivate an account by setting its active status to 0 using the account ID.
Instructions
Deactivate an account (sets active status to 0)
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| account_id | Yes | The account ID (account_id) |
Deactivate an account by setting its active status to 0 using the account ID.
Deactivate an account (sets active status to 0)
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| account_id | Yes | The account ID (account_id) |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It only states the status change, omitting important behavioral details like whether the action is reversible, cascading effects, or authorization requirements.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, concise sentence with no filler. It immediately conveys the core purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a mutation tool with no output schema, the description lacks any mention of return values or error conditions. It is minimally adequate but leaves gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what is in the schema; it only restates the parameter name.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('deactivate') and resource ('account') and explains the mechanism ('sets active status to 0'). It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'reactivate-account' and 'delete-account'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives, nor does it mention prerequisites, such as required permissions or reversibility.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/asachs01/float-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server