get-role-permissions
Retrieve all permissions assigned to a role by providing its ID.
Instructions
Get all permissions for a specific role
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| role_id | Yes | The role ID (role_id) |
Retrieve all permissions assigned to a role by providing its ID.
Get all permissions for a specific role
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| role_id | Yes | The role ID (role_id) |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description does not disclose any behavioral traits beyond the action. For example, it doesn't specify if the output includes inherited permissions, or if any special authentication is required.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, direct and to the point. No extraneous words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple getter with one parameter, the description is adequate but could mention the output format (e.g., list of permission strings). No output schema exists, so some return value context would be helpful.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% (minimal description for role_id). The description does not add any additional meaning beyond the schema, so baseline 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the action ('Get') and resource ('all permissions for a specific role'). It distinguishes from sibling tools like get-role (which gets role metadata) and update-role-permissions (which modifies permissions).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like check-role-access or get-roles-by-permission. No context on prerequisites or limitations.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/asachs01/float-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server